However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) operated a sexual traffic business establishment with three rooms, shower rooms, and betacks from the first floor of the Guro-gu Seoul Building; (b) received cash of KRW 100,000 from D, which was found to be a customer at the above business establishment on October 12, 2013; and (c) had female employees E take charge of the telegraph of D and have sexual intercourse with D, thereby engaging in the conduct of arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning suspect interrogation protocol concerning D;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [The defendant seems to have 40,000 won out of 100,000 won for sexual traffic received from D] The defendant committed the instant crime even though he had a record of having been issued a summary order of a fine of five million won due to the crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. on July 23, 2013, and the defendant led to the confession of the instant crime, and the background, means, methods, results, etc. of the instant crime shall be determined as the same as the order.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.