beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.01.12 2016고단828

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (domination) and violated the Road Traffic Act (after an accident), thereby engaging in Crando taxi driving service.

On March 5, 2016, the Defendant driven the above taxi on March 19:00, and driven the cafeteria in front of the E cafeteria in Franpo City D along the two-lanes of the front of the empic apartment on the empic square, which is located in the same route as the empic square.

At the time, there were nights and lots of vehicle traffic volume, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front door, the left and right, and the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was driven by the victim F, who was driven by negligence while under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, prior to the front part of the taxi operated by the Defendant.

G Receiving the rear part of the enclosed cargo vehicle, and due to its shock, the said cargo vehicle was parked on the right-hand side, and the victim H owned by the victim H, who was parked on the three-lane side of the said cargo vehicle, received the rear part of the said passenger vehicle, and the victim JJ owned by the victim J, who was parked on the front side while being pushed down in the future.

The defendant continued to have caused the above accident, which led to the collision between the center line and the center of the center of the center of the vehicle in the front of the P, the part adjacent to the driver's seat of the above taxi operated by the victim L, which was driven by the P P EX in the vicinity of the P square in front of the apartment in the front of the two-lanes of the opposite lane, is shocked by the part adjacent to the driver's seat of the above taxi operated by the defendant, and the part adjacent to the driver's seat of the victim N, which was parked on the third-lane of the opposite lane, and the part adjacent to the driver's seat of Q Ra car in the victim P, which was parked on the other 30 meters.