However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

On May 22, 2013, the Defendants sold F hotel building and land to H, an agent of the victim G, the Plaintiff, at the F hotel in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si. On November 9, 2009, the Defendants offered KRW 50,000,000,000 to the said I as the secured debt for the creditor I’s lease deposit deposit, and offered the said I as the security for transfer, “30,000 television for 42,29,000 television in the above hotel guest room, 30,29,000 television for 30,000 32,000,000,000,000, 34,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00.

However, in light of the victim’s position, the Defendants did not notify the victim of the fact that “the instant hotel fixtures are provided as security for transfer to the said I,” which constitutes an important consideration in calculating the sales price of the hotel and paying the sales price.”

Ultimately, as long as there is no problem in the legal relationship of the hotel fixtures of the instant case, the Defendants deceiving the victim, and thereafter, acquired approximately KRW 50 million from around that time to August 20, 2013 property benefits by receiving the full payment of the said sales amount from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Some of the statements made by each prosecutor's interrogation protocol (including H statements) against the Defendants

1. According to the evidence in the judgment of the complaint (including a copy of the complaint attached thereto), since the defendants seems to have operated a F Hotel in the same business, it is difficult to see that the defendant A was unaware of the fact that he provided security for transfer of the hotel fixtures of this case.

Defendant B.