beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.07.16 2014가단10154

명예훼손에 따른 손해배상 청구

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that he was aware of the Defendant in a cartoon-related event, and that he found drinking water or gave gift to the Defendant in order to obtain the Defendant’s self-defense.

During that period, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to no longer find any longer, and the Plaintiff returned home.

Since then, the defendant threatened the defendant to harm the plaintiff's reputation on the Internet blog bulletin, the relevant notice was disseminated, thereby the plaintiff's honor was deteriorated, and the plaintiff was treated as a hospital with a depression.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff medical expenses of KRW 63,600, consolation money of KRW 6,896,400, and the plaintiff has the obligation to return the books in the attached list that the plaintiff donated to the defendant in order to obtain the defendant's subparagraphs and to return if it is impossible to return them.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the defendant participated in cartoons-related paints and cartoons, and among them, the plaintiff found the plaintiff who participated in the cartoon-related events on several occasions, and the plaintiff found the defendant who participated in the cartoon-related events on several occasions, and the defendant demanded that the plaintiff not be found any more than once, but the defendant found the defendant or sent a letter to the plaintiff. The defendant posted a bulletin Nos. 1 and 3 (hereinafter "the notice of this case") on the Internet log that he operated on February 23, 2013, the defendant posted a bulletin Nos. 1 and 3, and the plaintiff deleted the notice of this case upon the request of the plaintiff for deletion, around June 2013, the Seoul High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for adjudication on the violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) and Information Protection (hereinafter "the defendant dismissed the application for adjudication on Feb. 31, 2013013, 2014.

(b) judgment;