However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 27, 2009, the Defendant is a person who has violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by receiving a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on August 22, 2012, by receiving a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Gwangju District Court at least twice.

On December 3, 2018, under the influence of alcohol 0.077%, the Defendant driven a 100-meter Franchising car from the Do preceding the Do in Gwangju Mine-gu to the front road located in Gwangju Mine-gu D, while under the influence of alcohol 0.07% of alcohol level around 22:19.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on detection of a violation of the Road Traffic Act;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: To refer to inquiries and to the application of each summary order statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Taking into account all the circumstances, such as the accused's criminal records, blood alcohol concentration level, driving distance, etc., as the grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation, etc. Act, and the accused's mistake;