beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.02.14 2018나73898

손해배상(산)

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the judgment of the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance are recognized to be justifiable ( there is no newly submitted evidence in this court). Accordingly, the grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as set forth in the judgment of the court of

Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance is to delete from "the defendant company" to "a corporation".

Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, Part 8 was employed by F (the representative director of the defendant) who was employed in manufacturing and selling the net, silent, etc. in the trade name of “B”, and the Defendant Company 10, “B,” respectively, was F.

The following details shall be added between the second and first half of the judgment of the first instance:

A person shall be appointed.

D. The Defendant was established on November 25, 2015 as the representative of F.

【A evidence No. 1 is added to the “based ground for recognition” No. 2 of the judgment of the first instance, No. 16. The following is added between 3, 13, and 14 of the judgment of the first instance. According to the above basic facts, the Defendant, a corporation established after the accident of this case, and cannot be deemed to have the duty to protect the deceased as it did not exist at the time of the accident of this case. Thus, the Plaintiffs’ claim for damages against the Defendant against the Defendant is without merit.

Even if the plaintiffs' claim against the defendant in this case contains the assertion that "the defendant succeeded to or succeeded to the F's liability for damages against the plaintiffs in F", the plaintiffs' claim is without merit as seen below.

If the first instance judgment No. 6-7 of the first instance judgment, the Defendant Company’s “F” is dismissed as “F,” and the first instance judgment’s “representative director of the Defendant Company” is deleted.

Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance is 16.