beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.05.15 2013고정2290

위증

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2012, the Defendant appeared at the court of Incheon District Court No. 411 located in Nam-dong, Incheon, Incheon, as a witness of the night-time theft incident against the above court No. 201Kadan7422 C, and testified as follows.

C Defense Counsel: D’s inquiry: D’s “Is the factory machinery and equipment to be received every time in scrap metal”; D’s “Is the witness, 100 tons of the scrap metal, 35 million won, or 40 million won or more, even if Is 100 tons of the scrap metal,” D’s “Is this difference?” and D’s “Is this difference?”’s total tonnage is 100 tons of the factory machinery and equipment of the non-vietal industry in the KAB, and written a estimate of 3-40 million won at the high iron price.”

Defendant’s answer: not.

C Defense Counsel: If so, why why the written estimate is written

The defendant's answer: "I will accept the machine in ice," and "I will accept the machine in ice," and I will write the above quotation."

As such, the Defendant testified to the effect that the price stated in a written estimate prepared by D is the acquisition price of used machines, rather than the scrap metal price for factory machinery and equipment.

However, in fact, the defendant evaluated factory machinery and equipment at the high iron price.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Witness’s testimony;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording or recording files CDs;

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 152 of the same Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant alleged that the aforementioned testimony was true, and thus, the aforementioned evidence was examined.