The Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime after being sentenced to imprisonment for one year and three months for the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (Direction of Narcotics, etc.) in 2009, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime after the completion of the enforcement of the sentence of imprisonment for 1 year and three months for the victims of the instant crime, and the victim of the instant crime has not reached 14 persons and has not been recovered from damage and has not been recovered from damage to AB, AC, O, Q, AD, and AE. In the criminal case against the accomplice C, the Defendant agreed with the victim P, and was favorable to the victim, such as victim J, H, L, K, M, N, and T, and there is no criminal power to commit the instant crime. In full view of the circumstances that the Defendant had been under investigation by the investigative agency after the instant crime, the Defendant escaped from the victim of the instant crime, and had his employees take advantage of excessive value of credit cards after inducing the victims to drink, and the circumstances and circumstances of the instant punishment of the instant crime.

2. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the damage amount of 10,000 won per annum of the annexed crime list as stated in the judgment below is a clerical error of "9,00,000 won".