In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

2. Determination

A. The court below’s decision is unreasonable in light of the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant; (b) the Defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; (c) the victim and the mother of the victim agreed with the victim that the victim and the mother of the victim want not to have the Defendant punished; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime in which the Defendant raped six times in de facto marital relationship; and (e) the Defendant committed the instant crime in which the victim was committed on six occasions; (c) the Defendant resolved his sexual desire over a long-term period; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime in which the victim was under the age of 12 to 14; (e) the victim’s age was under the age of 12; and (e) the victim was under a great mental shock that the victim could not recover throughout his life; and (e) the various conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings, such as the motive for the crime; (e) the means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. As long as the Defendant filed an appeal against a prosecuted case, it is deemed that an appeal against an attachment order case has been filed pursuant to Article 9(8) of the Act on the Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders. However, the Defendant failed to submit any grounds for appeal regarding the attachment order case, and even if examining the lower judgment, there is no ground for reversal after ex officio investigation as to the part of the attachment order case.

3. Conclusion.