However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) purchased around February 2, 2014; (b) did not register CA110 pyca and did not attach a license plate; and (c) did so in a factory of “C” in the racing-si where the Defendant works for the Defendant, who purchased CA110 pyca, thought that the Defendant had a license plate attached to the above pycaba.

1. On February 2014, the Defendant illegally used air defense, attached D registration number plates obtained for the purpose of exercising them at the above “C” factory, and attached them after CA 110 U.S.C. owned by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant used air unlawfully.

2. On August 13, 2017, the Defendant of the unlawful use public symbol events (hereinafter “Defendant”) operated the CA110 Oba, which was owned by the Defendant, who attached the D registration number plate, for the purpose of exercising the right on the road of the Onnuri church located in the 60th of the Chonuri-si, Sejong-si.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the illegally used air defense.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of the above CA110 Oralone’s objection.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in the above 2. Paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements made to E and F;

1. Investigation report (illegal use of official marks, events, and photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 238(1) of the Criminal Act (Unlawful Use of Code), Article 238(2) and Article 238(1) of the Criminal Act (Unlawful Use of Code), Article 46(2)2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act (the fact that the mandatory insurance is not operated, the choice of imprisonment with labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the records are as follows: the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime.