beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.23 2017고단1294

절도등

Text

1. Defendant A’s judgment [2017 order 1294, 2017 order 2336, 2017 order 2597, 2017 order 3597, 2017 order 6123, 2017 order 6233].

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In the other cases except for the case No. 6233, the “Defendant” refers to Defendant A’s “Defendant A”.

[criminal records] On February 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the Incheon District Court for criminal fraud, etc. on August 17, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 17, 2017.

[2] On November 24, 2016, the Defendant discovered a bank with a face value of 150,000 won at the market price of 5.60,00 won in cash between the victim F and the victim’s property, and stolen the victim’s property with a wall value of 1.560,000 won in cash, from E located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon around November 24, 2016

On September 21, 2016, the Defendant, at the HPC room located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Seoul on September 21, 2016, discovered the victim I’s cell phone (J) information in an influence method, and entered the said information by accessing the K site and charging 300,000 won.

As above, the defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to 300,000 won by inputting the victim's cell phone information without authority into the computer or any other information processing device without authority.

On September 12, 2016, the Defendant reported on the Internet website L L L, “A person who promptly issues a bond” prepared by the victim N, and made contact to the victim by visiting the victim, and made a false statement to the victim that “A person who makes a small-sum settlement of Grand gift certificates and piracy in P provided by theO with a small-sum mobile phone, and then a loan to the extent of the amount corresponding to the delivery of merchandise coupon information.”

However, even if the defendant received mobile merchandise coupons from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to make loans to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby, he is entitled to 50,000 won for Grand gift certificates on the same day from the victim, and the defendant is entitled to 50,000 won for gift certificates.