beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.02.12 2014고단37

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

1. The defendant A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

except that this judgment shall be subject to each of the following subparagraphs:

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

E (Suspension of indictment on the same day) is a business owner of a game room with no trade name on the first floor below the building of the Masanpo-gu F. Defendant A is an employee who is in charge of the work of exchanging the above game room by the head of the branch office who requested the above E to undergo an investigation at the time of crackdown, and Defendant B is an employee who is in charge of the work of exchanging the above game room. Defendant B is an employee who is in charge of the role of the "recition" and the settlement of accounts, such as the dispatch of enforcement officers and the confirmation of entry customers. Defendant C is an employee

The Defendants, using the 8th "Yato2" game machine, 7th "Satop" game machine, and 4th "Satop" game machine, which did not receive a classification together with the above E, conspired to exchange points that the above game room customers acquired by using the game and exchange them.

On December 20, 2013, from around 22:40 of the same month to around 23:40 of the same month, the above E set up 19 game instruments, such as “Yatoma2,” which were not rated in the above game room, and play a role of “influence” and “fluence” in the attraction of customers. The Defendant A, who, in turn, deducted the scores obtained through the game from 4 points, exchanged them into 18,00 won by deducting 10% per 4 points of commission, and Defendant B, together with the above E, made a settlement of profits while serving as “fluence”, and Defendant C, within the above game room, took the character of customers.

Accordingly, in collusion with the above E, the Defendants provided the game products not classified to the above E for the use of the customers who found the game site, and operated the game room business for exchange business according to the scores obtained through the use of the above game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of G, H and I;

1. Photographs of telephone data;

1. An investigation report (to analyze and report the details of currencies);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)1 and 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry as to facts constituting a crime, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Defendant A and B shall be punished by imprisonment and imprisonment;