beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.16 2013고단3100

사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 6,000,000 (land million).

Defendant

B above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on June 21, 2001, a summary order of a fine of 20 million won was issued by the Seoul Central District Court for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., on April 7, 2010, a person who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Incheon District Court on April 7, 201 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months and a suspended sentence of two years at the Seoul Central District Court on August 10, 201.

Defendant

B on July 1, 2009, the Seoul Southern District Court issued a summary order of one million won as a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and the same criminal records are more than twice.

1. From May 11, 2013 to May 18, 2013, Defendant A opened an illegal game room in Jung-gu in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and 60 game machine and 5 game machine of “sea open”. Defendant A, who is an employee in charge of B’s access management, CCTV monitoring, card charging, and exchange, was employed as an employee in charge of cleaning the heart and the place of business for customers.

① The above “sea-to-sea” game was a game product with an example function to obtain 10,00 points or 10,000 points or more on the screen, 50,000 points or more on the screen, or 50,000 points or more on the screen, and a metari function, regardless of the customer’s records of judgment, with which it is intended to obtain high points by an incidental appearance of the above screen, such as ancient, top, and piracy, regardless of the customer’s records of judgment, and ② the above “Wang” game was a game product with which the order of race and horse was determined by a friendly outcome, regardless of the customer’s ability.

Nevertheless, the defendant gives 10,00 points per 10,000 won to many unspecified customers, and if the defendant gives 10,000 points per 10,000 points to customers, and the defendant uses the above card to make customers agree with each other.