2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the number of crimes in this case, which constitute a commission of goods sales fraud against many and unspecified persons via the Internet site, is considerably poor; (b) the number of crimes is high; (c) the victims are up to 42 persons; (d) the damage is not recovered; (c) the crime committed during the period of suspension of the same type of fraud under the Aggravated Act is committed; (d) the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant; (e) the amount of personal fraud or the total amount of the crimes is not so significant; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (e) other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., it does not seem unfair

3. The appeal by the public prosecutor on the conclusion of the judgment is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.