Examining the record, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the instant crime was not a concurrent crime of fraud with the judgment that became final and conclusive on August 19, 2015 and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

There is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below is erroneous in the deliberation of sentencing conditions is ultimately unfair.

According to Article 383 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal shall be allowed on the grounds of unfair sentencing.

In this case where a more minor punishment is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.