If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2017. 2. 28. 22:38 경 광주 서구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 주점에서 술에 취해 다른 손님들에게 욕설을 하는 등 행패를 부리다가, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 광주 서부 경찰서 D 파출소 소속 경위 E, 순경 F으로부터 귀가요구를 받았음에도, 위 주점 앞길에서 위 경찰관들에게 “ 내가 뭘 잘못했느냐,

Skhee is a Democratic Police;

In addition, police officers expressed that “F would be subject to the payment period of penalties, procedures for filing an objection, etc.” to F, and assault F’s face and neck with F’s hand, and interfere with legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling and notification of reported cases by F, who is a police official, by assaulting F’s 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made to F in the police statement protocol;

1. Each entry in G and E;

1. To describe a copy of the notice of penalty payment;

1. Application of the statutes on images of damaged photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good in that the defendant takes a bath to a police officer who is performing legitimate official duties and uses violence.

However, the defendant was the first offender, recognized the crime from the beginning of the investigation, and reflects his mistake.

The defendant was found to have committed a crime by drinking and deposited KRW 1 million for the victim police officers.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.