However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 12, 2017, at around 00:50 on September 12, 2017, the Defendant sought a search and consultation at the above location while under the influence of alcohol at a police box located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and requested that the above police box work slope D is in other cases, and thus, the Defendant was asked the above D to move down at any time; and

I explained that this fargue farch far, this har and harb har, etc., and assaulted the farb of the above D’s chest with her head.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police boxes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act / [the scope of punishment] There is no person who does not have a basic area (6 months to one year and six months) / [the person who is subject to special sentencing] / [the decision of sentence] / although the defendant had the same record, it is not good that the defendant is committing a crime in this case again, but there is a favorable circumstance, such as the confession and reflect, but there is no criminal record, etc.