대표자지위존재확인 등
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. On the 4th page 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the portion to be dismissed or added “20.” shall be deemed to be “20 days.”
Each of the 7th judgments of the first instance court, 17th 14th 8th 16th 20th 16th 20th 16th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 1st 201.
Each of the 8th judgment of the first instance court " September 17, 2018" shall be deemed " September 19, 2018," 15, 17, 3, 19, 13.
8 pages 8 of the judgment of the first instance, "20" shall be deemed "20 to 23".
The 14th judgment of the first instance shall be deleted from the 9th judgment.
The 15th page 15 of the first instance judgment "202." is "202", and the 6th class "2005." is "205." respectively.
15 pages 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be the Wintersing Council.
See 17 pages 17 of the first instance judgment, “Evidence 38, 39, 41, 52 through 57” shall be added to “Evidence 38, 39, 41, 52 through 57.”
The first instance court's 17 pages 21 to 18 pages 5 are as follows.
【B) The Plaintiffs asserted that H did not obtain the consent of all the members of the L-based Council because T was not present at the time of the commencement of the L-based Council on H. However, even if T was unable to attend an oral hearing with respect to H held at the R-School on May 12, 2011, the Plaintiffs responded to the question, “I would like to answer the question,” “I would like to refer only to the fact that T did not visit the R-based school on May 12, 2011 through the above written testimony, and “I would like to answer the question,” “I would not agree to the commencement of H-based services or would not have agreed to the effect that H-based services were invalid.”