강간미수
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 40 hours of order to attend a course) is too unfasible.
2. The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant, where the Defendant, along with the victim living beside his house, drinked the victim’s clothes, and attempted to rape the victim against the victim’s will. The crime of this case was committed in bad character and method of committing the crime. The victim appears to have caused considerable mental shock and sexual humiliation.
On the other hand, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is against the defendant, the crime of this case is committed against the attempted crime, the defendant does not want the punishment against the defendant by agreement with the victim, and the defendant does not have any record of punishment or punishment exceeding the fine.
위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 1년 6월 ~ 15년 ◈ 양형기준의 적용 미수범이므로 양형기준이 적용되지 아니함 , 제1심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제1심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점(대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도3260 전원합의체 판결 참조) 등을 종합해보면, 원심이 피고인에게 선고한 형이 너무 가벼워서 부당하다고 할 수 없다.
Therefore, the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.