However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 22, 2015, at around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the first floor of the building C in the building C, and reported from the first floor of the building C, and took measures to have the Defendant returned to the Republic of Korea; (b) the Da District security guards of the Incheon Southern Police Station, which called “police booms, would not flick, would flick, will flick, I am flick, I am hick.” The Defendant flicked E with the voice “I flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, and flick, flick, flick, flick,

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted E, a police officer, to interfere with legitimate execution of duties of police officer's patrol over crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is the case of assault by a police officer taking measures to invalidly a defendant, who was written in this case, and the crime is not very good and a sentence of imprisonment is to be imposed.

However, the execution of imprisonment is suspended, and community service is ordered to prevent recidivism in consideration of the fact that the defendant has a deep-depth and healthy life, that the defendant does not have the same criminal history and has a criminal record of violence one time, but is a year 192.