On January 2016, the Defendant received a proposal that 100,000 won per day will be given if he/she delivers a passbook, etc. via the Internet or if he/she provides an Internet with a statement that he/she will pay the price, contact with a person who is not the victim of the name, and keeps the passbook.

1. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act;

A. On April 15, 2016, the Defendant, with knowledge of the fact that he/she could use the passbook, etc. for hosting, received and kept a physical card (i.e., e., e., e., e., e., e., set up in Seoul Special Metropolitan City D, one, and one account password connected to the Korean bank account (G) opened in the name of F from F, and delivered the above e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.,

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with C, kept and delivered an access medium with the knowledge that it would be used in the crime.

B. From January 2016 to April 2016, the Defendant received and kept 15 approaches to the company bank, post office, and the agricultural cooperative account, respectively, through Kwikset service from the name in the location of Pyeongtaek-si bus terminal, etc. in Pyeongtaek-si., and received and retained 15 copies of the access media (one-time password creation machine) connected to the company bank, post office, and the agricultural cooperative account, respectively, to be used for crime.

2. The Defendant, along with the above C, sent a password, etc. necessary for the transfer of the account to a person with no name, knowing that the said F’s account may be used for the phishing crime at the same time and place as the above 1-A.

Accordingly, on April 15, 2016, a name-free person made a false statement to the victim I who contacted through the Internet “H” website as if he/she sold He/she was the victim I, and he/she received 10,703,000 won from the victim to the bank account in the above F name on the same day.

Accordingly, the Defendant, together with C, is not a person to be named.