beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.06.21 2017고정271

무고

Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

1. Determination on Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant” in this paragraph)

A. On January 23, 2015, the Defendant reported 112 to the effect that he was assaulted by E from Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do around 06:00 on January 23, 2015. On February 24, 2015, the Defendant was present at the police station in Ulsan-do, Ulsan-do, and was investigated by F after being investigated by F, and “I am am her one with the front of other car in the E driving.”

Dobucks the low, so I would like to receive treatment in the Ambuck m, Buckbucks, and I would like to keep the injury back after the car.

Although the statement " was made, there was no fact that E had shocked Defendant for a passenger car."

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to public offices for the purpose of having E receive criminal punishment.

B. (1) The key issue of the instant case is the date, time, and place, whether E has shocked the Defendant with a passenger car.

(2) The Defendant consistently brought the Defendant into a passenger car from an investigative agency to this court.

On the statement, E also states that it is consistent with the investigative agency to this court, and that it is not sufficient to use a passenger car.

However, the Defendant initially stuffed the Defendant E-lane (18 pages of evidence record) and then dried up, and then changed part of the Defendant’s statement (304 pages of evidence record) while being pushed up with E at the speed, rather than shocking the Defendant (304 pages of evidence record).

(3) Although the video is not obvious, a vehicle driven by E around around 06:36:20, which is the result of the CD screen reproduction (in the third trial date) submitted by the Defendant (in the third trial date), and CH3 video reproduction, which is written in around 06:36:20, can be easily shocked against the Defendant, and the Defendant could live in the future.

The result of the video reproduction of one Part E (in the fourth trial date), and the defendant's front of the vehicle driven by E, the front of the vehicle driven by E.