However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-priced car.

On June 11, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 08:20, and led to the left-hand turn to the right-hand turn from the front side of the erode at the erode of the erode of the erode.g.

At this point, the signal apparatus is an intersection installed, and in the direction of the defendant's proceeding, the vehicle stop signal has been displayed, so the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by observing the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in violation of the signal and received the front part of the passenger car in front of the right edge of the passenger car, which was driven by the victim C(58 tax) (58) who was driven in accordance with the straight line from the erode of the erode on the face of the erode.g., the Defendant also received the front part of the erode of the erode cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim C to suffer injury, such as light fright, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above, and the victim E (55 years of age) who was accompanied by the bandon cargo onto the bandon vehicle, suffered injury, such as a bandon bandon bandon bandon bandon bandoning, etc., for about four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A report on internal investigation (as to attachment of photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant caused a traffic accident in violation of the signal that he/she is driving a motor vehicle, and thereby, he/she sustained injury from two victims.

However, the defendant is against the law.

The defendant is a same crime.