소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Basic facts
A. H completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 18, 1981 with respect to the 5,375 square meters of I forest land in Jeju-si on October 9, 1974.
The Plaintiffs completed the registration of ownership transfer on the above land (hereinafter “Plaintiffs’ land”) with 1/3 shares on December 18, 2009, respectively.
B. On July 10, 1996, the transfer registration for ownership was completed in the name of Nonparty J on July 10, 1996, the F farm site No. 1,653 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant D land”) adjacent to the Plaintiffs’ land, and each transfer registration was completed in the name of Nonparty K on May 23, 200, and on June 8, 200, in the name of Defendant D on June 8, 200.
C. On June 8, 2000, G farm site 1,653 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant E”) located in Jeju-si adjacent to Defendant D’s land was divided from Jeju-si F on June 8, 200, and each ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of Defendant E on August 24, 200 after the division. < Amended by Act No. 6242, Apr. 18, 2013>
Attached Form
There is a boundary-project fence (hereinafter “instant boundary-project fence”) according to the line connecting each point in sequence, (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6).
[Evidence A 1 through 6, Results of the Verification by this Court]
2. Of the plaintiffs' assertion on the cause of the claim, there is a difference between the plaintiffs' land and the land of this case with the land of this case where the part of "B" was 269 square meters connected with each point in sequence, and the part of "B" among the land of this case among the land of this case, which is 227 square meters connected each point.
Part B of the above "B" and "Partial land" are the land in dispute of this case.
As H had been prior to the purchase of the Plaintiffs’ land, H occupied the instant dispute in peace and openly with the intent to own the land from October 9, 1974, and the Plaintiffs succeeded to the possession of H until now.
Thus, H's first acquisition by prescription after the lapse of 20 years from the time of possession of the land in the dispute in this case. < Amended by Act No. 4790, Oct. 9, 1994>