If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. At around 01:201:30 on June 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) she was under the influence of alcohol in front of D’s singing room from K’s (Seoul) to D’s sing room; (b) without any justifiable reason, she was inflicted upon the victim E (the victim 18 years of age) by drinking cream, tensions, etc., requiring treatment for about 14 days in his/her hand; and (c) the victim F (ma; 19 years of age) went beyond the victim F (ma; 19 years of age); and (d) the victim’s face at the time when he/she continued to stop treatment for about 3 weeks; (d) the victim G (the victim 19 years of age) went beyond the floor at around 5-6 times; and (e) the victim’s face at the time when he/she went beyond the victim’s face to take treatment for about 14 days; and (e) the victim’s face at the time 2-15 days of drinking.

2. On June 18, 2012, at around 01:40, the Defendant entered a singing room operated by the Jung-gu Daejeon District Court B victim I, and found the victims mentioned in paragraph (1). The Defendant, “I”, and “I”, as drinking, destroyed the entrance door door door of the room equivalent to KRW 75,000 at the market price, and thereby, damaged property of KRW 2,180,000 in total by asking the arms from one’s own arms to the wall, etc. so as to cover KRW 2,105,00 in repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the respective police protocol protocol to E, F, G, H and J

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), the choice of fines in respect of the relevant criminal facts, the choice of penalties, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that the sentencing of the sentence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is identical and two times, and the victims’ injury is not less severe.