2. The judgment of the court below is divided into the facts that the defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in 2009, and that the defendant would not repeat the same crime again after scrapping the vehicle of this case. However, while the defendant is sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime in 2000 and for the same crime in 2007 due to the crime in violation of the Road Traffic Act in 200, 2 years of suspension of execution in 4 months, 2 years of suspension of execution, 2 years of violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2002, 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in 209, 6 months and 209, and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in 209. The crime of this case is committed during the repeated period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, and the records and arguments of this case including the defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances of crime, and circumstances after the crime cannot be sentenced to a heavier punishment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.