The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) KRW 4,700,000, and KRW 8,000,000, and the designated parties E.

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

B. Judgment on deemed confession against Defendant B (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

C. Judgment on Defendant D by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. In full view of the purport of evidence Nos. 2-1 through 17-3 of the evidence Nos. 2-1 to 17-3, Defendant C received money as the security deposit for return from the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointeds entrusted by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointeds with the duty to return the money as stated below. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the Appointeds (Appointed Party), the Appointeds (Appointed Party), the Appointed, F, L, M, and the J did not proceed with the duty to return the above security deposit, and the reasons for return occur after the return, the P Tours (Appointed Party), the duty to return the money as stated in the following table Nos. 2-1 to 3-17, and the duty to return the money as stated in the above 3-10-day Ordinance, the duty to return the money as stated in the 10-day Ordinance to the 10-day Special Cases Concerning the Return of the Deposit, the duty to return the money as stated in the above 2-day Ordinance No. 1 to the Plaintiff’s 2.3.

The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties claimed the amount of a fake payment, A. 4.7 million won on April 27, 2012 (4.7 million won on the deposit for the return of KRW 4.7 million) and KRW 4.7 million on March 25, 2012, KRW 8.7 million on March 25, 2012.