However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a Cren car.

On July 5, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car at around 17:10, and led the front of the road D located in Gangnam-si to drive along the two-lanes of the e-mail distance from the jurisdiction of the Gangseo-si.

There are crosswalks where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in the driving of the motor vehicle and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not properly examine the front side, while proceeding in contravention of the signal while the signal of the Defendant’s driving direction was driven by the Defendant’s failure to keep the front side and received the front part of the car driving by the Defendant’s front part of the victim F (W, 61 years old) who crosses the crosswalk to the port from the right side of the Defendant’s driving direction.

The Defendant suffered by occupational negligence the injury to the above victim, such as the left flag and the flag of the flag of the flag of the flag of the 10-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Photographs related to each accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, the proviso to Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that it is a pedestrian accident in violation of the reason and signal signal for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the following sentencing grounds) is an unfavorable circumstance that causes serious injury to the victim.

However, it is against the fact that it is covered by comprehensive insurance and agreed with the victim, and it is faithfully living without criminal power, and the details of the crime in this case and the support relationship (90 women's mother support) are supported.