According to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance and asserted only unfair sentencing as the grounds for appeal.

In such a case, the argument that the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the causation between deception and fraudulent act and the grant of property or by mistake of facts cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, even if ex officio review the judgment of the court below, there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment due to the above mistake.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.