However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a singing practice room in Pyeongtaek-si C, and a singing practice room business operator is prohibited from employing a contact loan.

Nevertheless, at around 21:30 on December 28, 2013, the Defendant received a request from E, a customer, to receive 30,000 won per 1 hour of the Domimimimimimimimimimimimimimimi, and paid it to the Domimimimi, and then, the Defendant borrowed the mobile phone (F) in the above name of E from the above E to contact the above mobile phone with the above mobile phone opening businessman, thereby allowing G and H to take the time of the above customers.

Accordingly, the defendant assisted the entertainment loan to customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, I and G;

1. The application of the police interrogation protocol of H (The above evidence reveals that the defendant lending his/her mobile phone in the name of E to the news release room business operator, and sufficiently recognizes the fact that the defendant sent his/her mobile phone in the name of E, so that he/she arranged customers to talk

1. Article 34 (2) and Article 22 (1) 4 of the Music Industry Promotion Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act are as follows: (a) despite the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime again in the absence of the past four times of punishment due to the same mistake; and (b) even if the facts constituting the instant crime are sufficiently recognized, the Defendant did not appear to deny and reflect the facts charged; and (c) other circumstances indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character