공사대금
1. The request is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The vice president C of the Defendant alleged by the Plaintiff to pay the construction cost on behalf of the Defendant, and the Plaintiff completed the installation work of the rain system among E removal works located in Jung-gu, Seoul.
However, the defendant does not pay the construction cost of 60 million won.
2. The defendant's assertion that the defendant had not subcontracted the construction work of non-interpreting to the plaintiff, and C is not the vice president of the defendant.
3. In light of the fact that subparagraph 1 of the judgment No. 1 (non-subcontract subcontract agreement) consists of a contractor as a “F Company G,” and subparagraph 4 (Non-statement 4) does not state the name of the Defendant Company that is not stated only in the name of each of the Defendant Company C, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is difficult to deem that the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff the construction cost for the non-limited installation.
4. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim cannot be accepted.