Around 2008, the Defendant was operating the LAB and closed its business due to the difficulties in its management. During the financial difficulties, the Defendant was seeking re-construction without a construction business license through a small-scale construction business. On January 2009, the Defendant: (a) received a subcontract from the FUB, which was constructing the “FU”, a general leisure facility, in the Seocho-si, Seocho-si; (b) the Plaintiff received two promissory notes with a face value of KRW 250 million in the issuance of the FUB; (c) the Defendant received two promissory notes with a discounted face value of KRW 20,000,000,000 from the FUB; (d) the Defendant received at a discount of the outstanding bonds from the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant received at a discount of KRW 48,00,000 from the Defendant to collect the outstanding bonds at a discount of KRW 20,000,000,000 from the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant received at a discount of the outstanding bond at a discount of KRW 25,00,0,0,00.

Around January 15, 2009, the defendant, at the above "D" office, was awarded a contract amounting to KRW 30 to 4 billion from the Friju Co., Ltd., and the defendant received two promissory notes, the face value of which is KRW 250 million from the Friju Co., Ltd., and thus, it is necessary to carry out construction work at a discount, and the defendant did not carry out construction work at a discounted price because there is no cash. If the above promissory notes, which are issued with the face value of KRW 200,000,000, are temporarily lent to the victim, the defendant starts construction work at a discount and borrows the bill discount of the issuance of Friju Co., Ltd.