A and B imprisonment for one year, five years of imprisonment for Defendant C and fine of 210 million won, and Defendant D for four years.

[Status of Defendants and related persons] A district Housing Redevelopment Development and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “the instant association”) was established in around October 2008 for the redevelopment and improvement project of housing units on the scale of 463 households at the JJ level in ASEAN-si around October 2008. K Co., Ltd (hereinafter “K”) around March 4, 2009 is located at the time of Mapopopo-si, a company established on January 4, 2001. The representative director is N’s comprehensive construction project of KRW 100 billion annually.

Around October 2015, a corporation was selected as a contractor and the corporation was changed to a L corporation.

M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “M”) is located in Ansan-si as a company established on January 24, 2002, and the representative director is a company incorporated by Defendant C for the main purpose of housing maintenance management, etc.

Around the end of 2008, a company registered with the competent authority as a company specialized in improvement projects of the instant partnership, which vicariously performed the affairs of the instant association regarding the consent to the establishment of the association, the application for authorization for establishment of the association, assistance for the selection of the designer and contractor, the application for authorization for the implementation of the project, the establishment of the management and disposal plan, etc., and Defendant C is the representative director of M.

Defendant

A and Defendant B, using the name cards of Defendant C and M around April 2008, soliciting and arranging the selection of the construction works from the executives of the redevelopment partnership, and among the construction enterprises selected as the contractor, they are referred to as “construction hub” under the agreement that three will be divided by receiving the consideration for solicitation and arrangement.

Defendant

D served as an auditor of the instant association from March 2009 to June 2010, and from June 2010 to November 201, 2015, D worked as the head of the instant association and has overall control over the internal and external affairs of the instant association, such as the maintenance of a contract, project size, and modification of a contract.

Defendant C, the representative of the rearrangement project management company, and Defendant D, the president of the association of this case, are criminal law in accordance with Article 84 of the Act on the Maintenance of Urban and Residential Environments.