자동차소유권이전등록
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff, who was married with the Defendant on November 28, 198, but divorced on February 2, 2016, is a disabled person of class 2 with intellectual disability. The Defendant purchased the instant motor vehicle in the name of the Plaintiff and used it until now to be divorced from the Plaintiff on August 11, 2009. Thus, the Plaintiff asserts that the title trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the said motor vehicle is terminated through the delivery of the complaint of this case.
Considering the existence of a title trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as to the existence of the instant motor vehicle, and the said motor vehicle is being used by the Plaintiff and the Defendant since its acquisition of ownership on August 11, 2009, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking to take over the transfer registration procedure for the instant automobile due to the termination of the title trust agreement is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.