If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On May 2, 2018, at around 13:10, the Defendant brought a dispute against the Defendant’s wife D and neighboring E in front of the 103 building Kimhae-si, and due to the Defendant’s cleaning of the pet dog, on the ground that the victim F (n, 64 years of age) who is the land of the above E (n, f4 years of age) suffered the said E’s letter, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor, thereby causing an injury to the victim, such as light dump, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On the ground that the Defendant, at the date and place of Paragraph 1, or at the victim G (n, 28 years old) took the challenged form as set forth in Paragraph 1 as a mobile phone, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Victim G (n, 28 years old); (c) the Defendant

The term "the victim was assaulted on the floor of the hand by setting the threshold of the victim."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, E, and F;

1. Application of the law of replys

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are favorable to the defendant, include: (a) the Defendant’s mistake in depth and reflects his fault; and (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim F and the Defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case against the defendant when he had been punished for the same kind of crime even before, and he did not know about the period of repeated crime.

In addition, in full view of the motive, means, and result of each of the instant crimes, various conditions of sentencing, such as the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, intelligence, environment, etc., and the arguments, were determined in the same sentence as the orders.