[Criminal Justice] On October 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on October 18, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 18, 2012, and is currently under suspension of execution. On January 23, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on July 11, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

"2013 Highest 736"

1. On September 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on September 18, 2013, at “Dju” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) at “Dju”, the Defendant ordered that the Defendant would pay the price even if he/she was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the victim E (25 years old); and (c) the Defendant received from the victim the amount equivalent to KRW 1,170,000 at the market price, i.e., e., 1,170,000.

2. Around 02:00 on September 29, 2013, the Defendant ordered “G main points” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and the fact is that the Defendant, even if he was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the victim H (the age of 42), did not have the intent or ability to pay the price, and that the Defendant received the payment from the victim, i.e., the victim, who received the amount equivalent to KRW 41,00,000 from the victim, i.e., the amount of KRW 1 disease, beer, and beer.

3. On October 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on October 24, 2013, at the “Jju” located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul; and (b) the Defendant ordered that the Defendant would pay the price in the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she was provided with alcoholic beverages from the Victim K (30 years of age); and (c) was provided by the victim with the amount equivalent to KRW 618,00 at the market price, i.e., two bottles and

The Defendant, around 19:10 on December 14, 2013, 2013, ordered “2013 Highest 8186,” with the attitude that the Defendant would be able to pay the price even if he was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the victim N, and that he would be able to pay the price without the intention or ability to pay it. In other words, the Defendant is 500ml from the victim.