교통사고처리특례법위반등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, while driving on an expressway by driving a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance, failed to maintain the safety distance with the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vicinity and caused 8 victims, such as the victim C, etc., to suffer 1 to 3 luxal fluoral fluoral fluor, etc., each of which was driven by 1 to 3 luxal fluoral fluor, and did not make any effort to recover damage even if 3 parts of the damaged vehicle are damaged by 22,400,000 won in total as repair expenses. In light of the above, the punishment (fine 10,000,000) imposed by the
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Prosecutor, considering all the circumstances, such as the confession and rebuttal of the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant’s economic condition is not good, the victim’s injury is not serious, and the character, conduct and environment of the Defendant, the background and consequence of each of the instant crimes, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed unfair, and thus, the prosecutor’s allegation above is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.