A. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement for C Bus (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”).

B. At around 19:35 on October 26, 2015, D entered the said intersection in order to drive the Defendant vehicle and drive the Defendant vehicle in a direct direction within the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the passage in front of the E, in the event of the economic globalization. Since the night and yellow light signal, etc. were operated at the time, it was operated, and thus, it was caused by the accident of the Plaintiff’s driver who entered the said intersection in order to drive the vehicle in the direction of the direction of the vehicle by neglecting his duty of care and drive the vehicle safely and by neglecting his duty of care in order to drive the vehicle in the direction of the road (F Housing Site Zone in the upper direction) from the front direction of the vehicle (hereinafter “accident in this case”).

C. At the time of the accident, the Plaintiff did not seem to have come from the Defendant’s vehicle, and D, however, considered to have stopped the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and was shocked by taking the buck in the immediately preceding accident and taking the hand on the left-hand side.

The defendant's running roads are four lanes and the plaintiff's running roads are two lanes, and the point where the accident occurred is the point where the defendant's vehicle exceeds one half of the intersection, and the plaintiff's vehicle is not going beyond one half of the intersection.

Due to the above accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the cage fage fage fage, external fry, crym scarf scarf scarfe, vertebrate escape, spine, vertebrate, the left-hand pelfe, scarfe, damage to the left-hand scarf scarfe,

[Evidence: Gap evidence 1 to 7, 10 to 12 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 2 (including paper numbers), the non-satisfy, and the whole purport of oral argument]

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the Plaintiff sustained the injury due to negligence during the operation of the Defendant vehicle.