However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

The Defendants decided to receive compensation from a person whose name is referred to as “D” was not known. The Defendants forged a letter of delegation in the name of Aju Capital Co., Ltd. and a certificate of automobile transfer for EMW automobiles, and a certificate of personal seal transfer for EMW automobiles under the name of the official document’s electronic management office’s registration office’s electronic management office’s registration office’s registration office’s registration office’s official document, and registered the said automobiles in the name of Defendant A by exercising the said certificate. After changing the vehicle number to F, the Defendants conspired to return the said automobiles to a person whose name is unknown.

On May 28, 2010, in order to obtain the registration certificate of the said passenger vehicle at the Dong-dong community service center at the Gu-si, Si-U.S. around May 28, 2010, the Defendants submitted to the public official in charge of being aware of the forgery, a letter of delegation, which is a forged private document, delivered by a person who was unable to know the above names, and exercised the above passenger vehicle under the name of Defendant A by submitting to the public official in charge of being aware of the forgery. On the same day, in the Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, and the G community service office, in order to transfer the above passenger vehicle under the name of Defendant A, the Defendants exercised one copy of the forged private document transfer certificate, which is a falsified private document, delivered by a person whose name is not known, and one copy of the forged official document

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as all the accompanying materials related to registration of transfer (including forged documents), all the accompanying materials, such as certificates of seal imprint, etc., and a written statement;

1. Relevant Articles 234, 231, 30 (a point of uttering of forged private document, choice of imprisonment), 229, and 225 (a point of uttering of forged public document) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes: Article 37 of the Criminal Act.