2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

A. The Plaintiff is an incorporated educational foundation operating C University. The Intervenor is a teacher employed as a full-time lecturer at C University D Campus on September 1, 2006 and served as an associate professor on September 1, 2007 and September 1, 2010, respectively, as an associate professor and a teacher employed until August 31, 2016, the expiration date of employment.

B. On April 20, 2016, the Plaintiff notified the intervenors of the expiration of the term of appointment and the possibility of applying for review of reappointment, and the Intervenor filed an application for review of reappointment with the Plaintiff around May 2016.

On May 31, 2016, the Board of Review on Appointment of Fixed-Term Teachers, which was held by the Plaintiff on May 31, 2016, decided to take measures according to the results of deliberation by the Teachers' Personnel Committee, even though the Intervenor satisfied the pre-appointed requirements.

C. As a result of the deliberation by the teachers’ personnel committee held on June 9, 2016 by the Plaintiff, the Intervenor notified that he/she was disqualified for reappointment on the grounds that his/her qualification as a professor under Article 6 of the appointment contract was insufficient (the problem of neglect, education ethics, dignity problem, and duty as an educator) due to the following reasons, and provided guidance to explain his/her objection by June 23, 2016.

1. Non-record of a lecture plan: Entering the lecture plan by affixing only “/” and abusing the current computer system, thereby providing students with any disadvantage related to the school plan and preparation for the course by abusing the computer system. In addition, the educational score without any disadvantage in the area of education for the evaluation of achievements shall be acquired normally;

2. Failure to participate in academic affairs activities: Failure to attend various short-term meetings and academic conferences related to academic affairs.

D. On June 22, 2016 (1), June 23, 2016 (2), June 24, 2016 (3j), June 24, 2016 (3j), and June 24, 2016 (4j), the Plaintiff held a teachers’ personnel committee, but submitted to the Plaintiff a written opinion to the effect that the decision not to be reappointed is unfair, instead of the Intervenor’s attendance.

E. On June 27, 2016, the president of the CU shall serve as the Intervenor to the Plaintiff.