유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The grounds for the judgment of the political party are the evidence additionally submitted at the trial, and they are not sufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion, and each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 28 and 33 (including each number), among the judgment of the court of the first instance, shall be rejected, and since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of the first instance, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence
[Supplemented Part] Under the third part, the first part of the first part was divorced on January 6, 1993.
“A divorced on January 5, 1993, the Plaintiff, etc., who is the father of the deceased, has no mental capacity, but there is no evidence that there was no such mental capacity in a maternal blood relative including the mother of the deceased and the mother of the deceased,” and the part 5 of the Table 3 of the 5th 4th 5th 5th 4th 5th 5th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 195.
2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified as the conclusion is consistent with this, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.