However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 6, 2010, the Defendant forged the signature of the above E without authority for the purpose of exercising authority by signing the “E” on the “E” column of the protocol of interrogation of a suspect with respect to the interrogation of a suspect with respect to personal information, in a criminal case of the Seoul Gwanak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station and at the office of the Criminal Team 3rd Police Officers, etc., which is located in Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with respect to the suspicion of assault against D by judicial police officers, etc.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, presented the forged E’s signature as if it were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Existing police suspect examination protocol against the defendant (A);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to the revision of personal information due to illegal use of a suspect);

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;