beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.09.03 2013고단1593

부정수표단속법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 1593] From November 4, 1991, the Defendant entered into a check contract under the name of the new bank, etc. Korea-Japan Financial Center and the Defendant, and entered into a check contract under the name of the Defendant.

On January 4, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number D, check amount of KRW 5,00,00,00, “5,000,” issued on April 7, 2013, 2013 at the printing office operated by the Defendant, located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the purpose of 606 of B building, and issued one check under the name of the Defendant, and presented the check to the Bank on April 8, 2013, when the holder of the check presented the check to pay, but did not receive a disposition of suspension of transaction from the date of the check until January 31, 2013. In addition, the Defendant issued four copies of the household check in the aggregate amount of KRW 20,00,000,00 as indicated in the attached Table 1, and presented it within the period of suspension of transaction, but did not receive a disposition of suspension of transaction.

[2013 Highest 2043] The Defendant entered into a check contract in the name of the new bank, etc. and the Defendant, from November 4, 1991, under the name of the new bank, etc. financial center and the Defendant.

around March 5, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number “C”, “E”, “5,00,000,000 won”, and the date of issuance “F.5,” under the Defendant’s name, which was the Defendant’s “C” operated by the Defendant, under subparagraph 606 of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Building, and issued one check under the Defendant’s name, and presented the check to the said bank on June 5, 2013, the date when the holder of the check presented the check to pay the check to the said bank on June 5, 2013, but did not receive a disposition of suspension of transaction until March 13, 2013, from that time, the Defendant issued six copies of the household check in the aggregate amount of KRW 30,00,000,000 as indicated in the attached Table 2-4 through 7,10,1110, and presented it within the period of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each accusation;

1. The date of issuance of a check for investigation report;