2. The fact that the Defendant, in the judgment of the court, led to the confession, reflects all crimes, and does not repeat the crime; there is no criminal record exceeding the fine; and the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim with the obstruction of business, etc. is favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes without being aware of multiple criminal records, such as the same type of crime, and the fact that the Defendant did not agree with the victim other than the victim interference with business, and did not take measures to recover from damage, etc., the Defendant is disadvantageous to the Defendant. In light of such circumstances and other circumstances, and all of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the argument of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior and environment, the sentence imposed by

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.