명예훼손
All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. On January 7, 2014, Defendant A damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts in the name of 10 members, despite the fact that the victim E embezzled public funds for senior citizens, Defendant A, who was in the second floor of the Management Office of the D Apartment apartment located in Busan-gun, Busan-gun, and that there was no fact that the victim E embezzled public funds for senior citizens.
B. Defendant B: (a) on October 31, 2014, Defendant B-A.
In the place indicated in the port, although the victim E did not use the public funds for senior citizens individually, the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts by following each sound, “the victim 10 or more members drinked without copying the reproduction machine at the frequency. On January 29, 2014, food was drinking by drinking people and drinking people in Russia.”
2. Each of the facts charged against the Defendants is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the written withdrawal of each complaint submitted by the Defendants, it can be acknowledged that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendants after the indictment of this case. Thus, each indictment against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.