The sentence of the court below against the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment and 619,060,000 additional collection charges) is too unreasonable.

2. In the judgment of the court below, the defendant recognized not only the bribe offering crime of this case but also the crime of violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act and took an attitude against the defendant's wrong act. Since the defendant made efforts to sell a set in addition to arranging acts in connection with the selection of a company's office, some of the money that the defendant received by the defendant can be viewed as a legitimate price for the above service. He complex tegypt Co., Ltd also seems to have paid money to the defendant in order to install a box box within a set by arranging the employees and employees of the G company. The defendant did not have any criminal history prior to the crime of this case; the defendant did not have any criminal history prior to the crime of this case; the defendant's health was very very rough due to the age of 74 years, such as urology, cardiopacopic spathy, and disorder in the knowledge function of the Gyeongdo, etc.

However, this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant serves as a member of the National Assembly and the president of the G company, etc. taking advantage of the fact that the defendant is in a position to exercise influence over the executives and employees of the G company, and the fact that the defendant actually gives a bribe to the outside director of the G company, etc., which constitutes a power-type corruption case, the fact that the social trust in the fairness of duties of the executives and employees of the G company deemed as public officials due to the crime of this case has been damaged, and that the amount received under the name of

The age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime of the defendant;