중소기업기술개발 지원사업 참여제한 처분 취소 등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the parties' claims are examined by adding the evidence submitted to the court of first instance to the
Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for supplementing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in Paragraph (2) below or adding the judgment of the plaintiff's argument of the court of first instance as stated in Paragraph (3) below. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence
2. It shall be written by cutting "from June 26, 2017 to "from June 28, 2017" in paragraph 4 inside the third top of the amended part to "from June 28, 2017."
Part 1 of the third top attached Table " July 4, 2016" shall be applied to " July 4, 2017."
The following shall be added below the table at the bottom of the third party:
A person shall be appointed.
E. On October 25, 2017, the Administrator of the Daejeon District Small and Medium Business Administration (the Administrator of the Daejeon District Small and Medium Business Administration, on July 26, 2017, did not distinguish between the organizational change and the following, and notified the Plaintiff of the final settlement of the instant settlement amount of KRW 164,315,000. The Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the purport that the amount recovered at the instant disposition would be KRW 164,325,000, as of May 20, 2019, the notice to the effect that the Plaintiff would be corrected to KRW 164,315,00,000, is merely a small and medium correction of only a part of the content of the instant decision. Therefore, it is difficult to deem that the notice was an independent disposition in itself or the validity of the instant decision is lost.
b. 1 of the first page of the "No. 13, 14, and 9" is added to the grounds for recognition.
Before being amended by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups Notice No. 2018-16, Mar. 13, 2018, each of the subparagraphs 1 through 6 and 22 table was “before the amendment by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups Notice No. 2017-5, Aug. 29, 2017.”