2. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant had a criminal record of a fine for the same kind of crime as the instant crime; (b) the victim’s chests and grandchildren twice in a short period; and (c) the background and method of the instant crime by which the victims committed an indecent act twice in a short period; and (d) the fact that the victims did not agree with the victims is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, in full view of the various sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the offense, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unreasonable as it is too unreasonable, in light of the following factors: (a) the Defendant is a disabled person who has a mental retardation disorder; and (b) the Defendant’s economic situation is difficult; and (c) the Defendant’

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.