When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates an international marriage intermediary in the name of "B".

No marriage broker shall indicate or advertise false or exaggerated contents.

There is no fact that the Defendant operated an international marriage broker in Vietnam, or entered into a contract with a local international marriage broker that permitted, reported, or registered an international marriage broker in that country, and there is no fact that he/she dispatched his/her employee (employee) to that country.

Nevertheless, around April 10, 2014, the Defendant posted a false or exaggerated disclosure of the company introduction organization of B’s Internet homepage (D) for the advertisement of the said company at the “B office located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, and 329” office, along with the phrase “Vinam branch office, Vietnam branch president (E), interpretation (F), and proceeding (G)” different from the objective facts in column, and published the Defendant’s photograph, such as H’s pro-friendly words (E), which is not the employees of the said company (employee).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The screen page of the B-site and the photograph of a closure of the organizing column;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment to the current status of international marriage registered companies);

1. Article 26 (2) 6 and Article 12 (1) of the Marriage Brokers Business Management Act concerning criminal facts, and Articles 26 (2) 6 and 12 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.