A. On September 25, 2001, Plaintiff A operated childcare facilities under the name of “E Child Care Center” (hereinafter “E Child Care Center”). Plaintiff B was registered as E Child Care Teachers from March 2006 to February 201 as Plaintiff’s child care teachers, and the Defendant, as attorney, represented the Plaintiffs in a lawsuit related to administrative disposition against the Plaintiffs in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-do.

B. On August 16, 2010, the head of Seocheon-gu Gun issued a disposition to revoke the qualification of childcare teachers and to refund subsidies of KRW 5,840,00 to the above Plaintiff on the ground that Plaintiff B had not worked as childcare teachers at the E childcare center from March 2006 to February 2010 on the ground that he lent the name of the childcare teacher, and that Plaintiff B had borrowed the name of the childcare teacher and received subsidies from Plaintiff B, and that the discharged child was provided with subsidies by pretending that the discharged child was attending the E childcare center, the head of Seocheon-gu Gun issued a disposition to suspend the operation of childcare facilities for six months, the suspension of the operation of childcare facilities for three months, the suspension of the qualification of the head of the childcare center for 229,654,400 on the ground that

(hereinafter “instant administrative disposition”). C.

Around July 8, 2010, the Plaintiffs entered into a delegation contract and lawsuit between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant with respect to the administrative disposition of the instant case and a contract under which the agent of the first instance court (Seoul District Court 2010Guhap3673) delegated the Defendant with a fee of KRW 5,50,000,000 to the Defendant on the same day. On September 28, 2011, the court of first instance rendered a decision to fully revoke the administrative disposition of the instant case on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize the “title of childcare teacher” which the head of Seocheon-gu Office used as the ground for the administrative disposition of the instant case, on the same day (hereinafter “instant judgment”).

The plaintiffs are only 10 million won contingent fees to the defendant on October 13 of the same year.